Permit logo
Home/Blog/

ReBAC in Practice: Permit.io Vs OpenFGA

Compare OpenFGA and Permit.io for ReBAC, from models and UI to ABAC and ops. See which fits your team: self-hosted control or managed speed.
ReBAC in Practice:  Permit.io Vs OpenFGA
Or Weis

Or Weis

|
  • Share:

Authorization has come a long way from simple role checks and hard-coded logic. As systems grow more collaborative and data becomes more interconnected, Relationship-Based Access Control (ReBAC) has become a leading pattern for managing permissions.

In this blog, we’ll compare two of the most popular implementations of ReBAC today: OpenFGA and Permit.io, and see how they differ in approach, developer experience, and real-world usability.

What Is ReBAC and Why It Matters

ReBAC (Relationship-Based Access Control) defines permissions based on the relationships between entities, users, groups, organizations, and resources, rather than fixed roles.

For example:

“A user can view a document if they own it, are a member of a group that owns the folder, or belong to the organization that manages it.”

This relationship-driven model is essential for platforms where hierarchies, inheritance, and dynamic sharing dominate access decisions, like SaaS collaboration tools, multi-tenant systems, or enterprise resource managers.

At its core, ReBAC represents authorization as a graph, allowing you to query how entities relate instead of re-implementing nested permission checks in every service.

The OpenFGA Approach: Code-First ReBAC

OpenFGA, originally developed at Okta and now a CNCF project, implements the Zanzibar model as a self-hosted service. Developers define an authorization model using a DSL and store relationship tuples in a database.

Example model:

type document
  relations
    define viewer: [user, group]
    define can_view: viewer

A tuple might look like:

user:carla is viewer of document:planning

To check access, the application sends a query to the OpenFGA API:

curl -X POST $FGA_URL/check \\
  -d '{"user":"user:carla","relation":"can_view","object":"document:planning"}'

Strengths

  • Open source and extensible
  • Backed by a large community
  • Powerful for data-driven, Zanzibar-style models

Trade-Offs

  • Requires hosting and maintaining infrastructure (DB, API, cache)
  • No UI for managing relations or policies
  • Purely ReBAC - no support for attribute-based conditions (ABAC)
  • Syncing application data to the graph can be complex

OpenFGA gives you fine-grained control, but you operate and scale it yourself.

The Permit.io Approach: Developer-First ReBAC

Permit.io builds on the same ReBAC principles as Zanzibar but focuses on developer velocity and operational simplicity.

Instead of managing a ReBAC database and writing your own admin UIs, Permit.io offers a managed authorization service with SDKs, APIs, Terraform support, and a no-code Policy Editor UI.

Developers define resources, roles, and relations as code, then extend them with attributes for ABAC-style conditions.

Example (Terraform):

resource "permitio_role_derivation" "folder_viewer_to_doc_viewer" {
  resource    = permitio_resource.document.key
  role        = permitio_role.doc_viewer.key
  on_resource = permitio_resource.folder.key
  to_role     = permitio_role.folder_viewer.key
  linked_by   = "parent"
}

With this setup, a user who can view a folder automatically inherits view access to all documents within it, so no extra checks or manual propagation are needed.

ReBAC with a No-Code UI

Permit.io provides developers with a permission management solution that allows smooth transitioning between RBAC, ABAC, and ReBAC all without changing your application code.

The Permit Policy Editor makes this possible with a no-code UI that automatically generates Rego policies for all three models and syncs them seamlessly with your Git, API, and UI interfaces.

This means both developers and non-technical stakeholders can create and manage ReBAC policies, build complex graph hierarchies, and define relationships between entities all visually, without writing a single line of code.

In the editor, relations (graph edges) can be created between resources (graph nodes) with just a few clicks, offering an intuitive, low-code experience for defining access logic.

policy-editor-rebac.pngpolicy-editor-graph.png

Try the Permit.io Policy Editor

Advantages

  • Managed ReBAC engine - no infra to run or scale
  • Visual Policy Editor for no-code policy management
  • Terraform + SDK integration for authorization-as-code
  • Hybrid ReBAC + ABAC model
  • Cedar compatibility (via Cedar-Agent)
  • Versioning and audit for governance

Considerations

  • Closed-source platform (but open SDKs and APIs)

Permit.io extends ReBAC beyond relationships into a complete authorization platform for modern apps.

Comparing the Two Implementations

Aspect Permit.io OpenFGA
Deployment Managed SaaS Self-hosted
Model Type ReBAC + ABAC ReBAC only
Policy Editor (UI) Yes No
Terraform Integration Yes Limited
Cedar Compatibility (via Cedar-Agent) No
Infra Maintenance None Requires ops
Versioning & Audit Built-in Manual
Best for Product & platform teams Infra-heavy teams

Summary: OpenFGA offers the core ReBAC engine; Permit.io adds the tooling, UI, and hybrid capabilities that make it production-ready.

Performance and Operational Considerations

OpenFGA is stateful and centralized, requiring developers to maintain a database of relationship tuples and scale it to handle authorization queries. While fast, its performance depends on how well you tune your storage and cache layers.

Permit.io operates as a managed service with global distribution, automatic caching, and real-time policy updates. No synchronization scripts or ops overhead are needed.

Permit.io can evaluate hybrid (ReBAC + ABAC) policies in a single decision API call, which is useful for complex systems where relationships and attributes matter.

Choosing the Right Tool for Your Use Case

Choose OpenFGA if:

  • You want open-source control and self-hosting
  • You need a pure ReBAC engine for a large internal system

Choose Permit.io if:

  • You want ReBAC and ABAC in one platform
  • You prefer Terraform, SDKs, and a UI for policy management
  • You don’t want to run and scale authorization infra yourself

Permit.io lets developers ship authorization as code and as a service.

Key Takeaways

  • ReBAC models permissions as relationships ideal for hierarchies and sharing
  • OpenFGA is a powerful open-source engine but requires operational investment
  • Permit.io delivers ReBAC and ABAC as a managed service with UI, Terraform, and Cedar supportFor teams who want to move fast and stay secure,
  • Permit.io offers the simplest path from model to production

In short, OpenFGA gives you the engine. Permit.io gives you the entire platform.

Written by

Or Weis

Or Weis

Co-Founder / CEO at Permit.io

Test in minutes, go to prod in days.

Get Started Now

Join our Community

2938 Members

Get support from our experts, Learn from fellow devs

Join Permit's Slack